Decoding the cowl trim tag on a 63 Impala
Posted byNotice: the_author was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 2.1.0 with no alternative available. in /home2/c235178/classiccarauto.com/wordpress2/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4666
Carl King - 01/02/08 at 10:02 pm
You can see how we determined the authenticity of this 63 impala SS in this email dialog from a gentleman who’s found a 63 Impala SS for sale. I’ll show you how we get a handle on the VIN number and the cowl trim tag details, and how we interpret them.
He wants to be sure he will get what he’s expecting to pay for, or at least verify the details of this 63 Impala SS. If it proves to be something other than what he’s looking for, he can use this information to negotiate the price, or walk away from the deal.
I’ll call him by his initials, LG.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Hi
> I am looking at purchasing a 1963 Impala SS I think ,and I was wondering If
> you could help me with the
> ACC codes
>
> the vin number is 31847L[nnnnnn](Numbers Removed for this post)
> the engine suffix is F1228HB
> The trim tag reads (this is what the person emailed me):
>
> 9D
> style 63-1847 Body TVN2858
>
> Trim 858-s Paint 932
>
> ACC E 2 CKM 3 Z28
>
> I am retired and I have been trying to research this vehicle out and
> purchase it.
> I would truly appreciate any help you can give me on this issue. I tried
> to
> write down everything as he sent it .I may have messed up in some of the
> sequence of the numbers and letters, I hope these are correct.
>
> thank you for your time and effort
> LG
>
>
Hi LG,
E is tinted glass all around
I have nothing for C, could it be a G?
K is air conditioning
M is Powerglide transmission
Z is metallic brakes, don’t know about the 28. There shouldn’t be any
numbers other than the group designators. Could he be misreading the tag?
Trim 858-s is “Saddle” w/ vinyl buckets, Paint 932 is Saddle and Tan
Get a picture of it if possible.
HB was used between 65-69, so the motor isn’t original.
65-68 Impala 327
69 Nova, Impala, Chevelle 350
TVN is not in the code book. This should be the assembly plant code and
the first letter should match the L in the VIN. The numbers after the
letters should be the same as the trailing numbers in the VIN as well.
I would suggest you go to the motor vehicle branch to find the records on
this VIN. This car either has the wrong VIN or the wrong cowl tag. It has
possibly had major body repairs in the past that might account for this
mismatch if some major body parts were replaced (like the firewall).
I wouldn’t pay top dollar for this car, and I might even walk away from it.
Carl
—
The Impala Project
> HI Carl:
> I want to thank you for that fast and very educational response.
> Here I am a perfect stranger and you took the time to give decode the data
> off the cowl tag.
> I am slowly getting the information I need and again, I thank you for your
> time.
> I just emailed the person and I ask him for a closeup pic of the tag so I
> can hopefully clarify some of the questions you raised.
> I guess from your reading on the info I sent you it is not a SS?
> I will email you when I get the pic of the cowl tag.
>
> LG
Well, I can’t say it’s not an SS. Unfortunately, not all SS models were
stamped with SS options unless the purchaser ordered those additonal
options. SS was a package, and only package options in addition to the
standard package items (options) were stamped on the cowl tag.
It might be an SS, but previous to 64, it is hard to prove. Funny enough,
after 67 it was also hard to prove since GM stopped recording SS package
options.
64 thru 67 were the only years that are easy to prove.
If you can get the suffix code off the differential housing, it might tell
you something. It’s stamped into the flat machined part of the housing
just like the engine suffix code. The diff suffix letters match the engine
suffix letters.
Carl
> Hi Carl
>
> regarding vin #31847L[nnnnnn] on the Impala,
> I guess the biggest concern or problem ,according to your data, is the
> last 4 or 5 numbers of the vin has to match the last 4 or 5 numbers on the
> body line of the cowl tag. And the first letter of the assembly plant code
> should be the same as the “L” in the vin.
> The other concerns I have are:
> The motor is not original.
> The last numbers on the ACC line (28) should not be there.
> I have a question about “TVN” in the
> body line.
> Carl do you think I have missed anything?
>
> Thanks for your time
> LG
Hi LG,
Sounds like you’ve got it down.
I’m not saying the numbers 28 shouldn’t be there, there are always cases
of undocumented stampings popping up. There are no records of numbers
appearing in the ACC code line other than the numbers that designated the
groupings of codes. The option codes are always letters.
There is no record of a TVN in the body line. The body line generally has
1 to 3 letters and they are an abbreviation of the name of the city the
car was assembled in. The first letter of the city should match the letter
in the VIN, and the first letter in the city abbreviation on the cowl tag.
This is a standard rule for all early 60’s chevy’s.
The only city that had an assembly plant that started with a T was
Tarrytown, NY. No TVN in that abbreviation. TA was used on cowl tags from
59-64 for cars that came from Tarrytown, NY.
I would be very careful about buying that car. The problems with these
codes may be an honest one. People misread these things all the time but
you still need to make sure you don’t overpay based on what this guy
thinks the car should be worth.
Carl
LG,
This is a good dialog for my blog. Do you mind if I post it? I won’t put
any of your contact info or your name in the posting. I’ll just use your
intials.
Carl
> Hi Carl
> You may post this ,no problem
> again I appreciate your professionalism in the handling of my questions.
> Thanks
> Ls
OK, Thanks LG, I’ll send you the link.
Carl
June 24th, 2010 at 11:15 am
Vetrox…
Free advice on How to Fix Scratched Window Glass….